Start with the state rule map

Top representative leader: Alabaster

A+ grade · 33,633 residents

Top representative leader: Juneau city and

C- grade · 31,969 residents

Directional only: this state’s representative city pool is still weak, so treat the card as a risk map and compare tradeoffs city by city.

Top representative leader: Camp Verde

B grade · 12,282 residents

Directional only: this state still lacks a strong representative leader, so use the card as a browse layer and verify cities individually.

Top representative leader: Fayetteville

A- grade · 97,227 residents

Top representative leader: Auburn

A grade · 13,758 residents

Top representative leader: Longmont

A+ grade · 98,958 residents

Top representative leader: Waterbury

C- grade · 114,356 residents

Directional only: this state’s representative city pool is still weak, so treat the card as a risk map and compare tradeoffs city by city.

Top representative leader: Wilmington

B- grade · 71,124 residents

Directional only: this state still lacks a strong representative leader, so use the card as a browse layer and verify cities individually.

Top representative leader: Washington

A grade · 672,079 residents

Top representative leader: Middleburg

A+ grade · 11,911 residents

Top representative leader: Valdosta

A+ grade · 55,222 residents

Top representative leader: Hawaiian Paradise Park

D+ grade · 13,273 residents

Directional only: this state’s representative city pool is still weak, so treat the card as a risk map and compare tradeoffs city by city.

Top representative leader: Moscow

A- grade · 25,868 residents

Top representative leader: Effingham

A+ grade · 12,258 residents

Top representative leader: Lebanon

A+ grade · 17,575 residents

Top representative leader: Waverly

A grade · 10,446 residents

Top representative leader: Atchison

A+ grade · 10,795 residents

Top representative leader: Lexington-Fayette

A+ grade · 321,122 residents

Top representative leader: Slidell

B grade · 28,664 residents

Directional only: this state still lacks a strong representative leader, so use the card as a browse layer and verify cities individually.

Top representative leader: Portland

B grade · 68,505 residents

Directional only: this state still lacks a strong representative leader, so use the card as a browse layer and verify cities individually.

Top representative leader: Easton

A+ grade · 17,202 residents

Top representative leader: Brockton

A+ grade · 105,080 residents

Top representative leader: Traverse City

A+ grade · 15,491 residents

Top representative leader: Austin

A+ grade · 26,167 residents

Top representative leader: Canton

A grade · 10,863 residents

Top representative leader: Columbia

A+ grade · 127,200 residents

Top representative leader: Billings

C grade · 118,321 residents

Directional only: this state’s representative city pool is still weak, so treat the card as a risk map and compare tradeoffs city by city.

Top representative leader: Lexington

A+ grade · 10,693 residents

Top representative leader: Sun Valley

B- grade · 22,697 residents

Directional only: this state still lacks a strong representative leader, so use the card as a browse layer and verify cities individually.

Top representative leader: Rochester

C- grade · 32,866 residents

Directional only: this state’s representative city pool is still weak, so treat the card as a risk map and compare tradeoffs city by city.

Top representative leader: Eatontown

A+ grade · 13,537 residents

Top representative leader: Los Alamos

B grade · 13,471 residents

Directional only: this state still lacks a strong representative leader, so use the card as a browse layer and verify cities individually.

Top representative leader: Saratoga Springs

B- grade · 28,542 residents

Directional only: this state still lacks a strong representative leader, so use the card as a browse layer and verify cities individually.

Top representative leader: Boone

A+ grade · 19,534 residents

Top representative leader: Fargo

A grade · 129,064 residents

Top representative leader: Celina

A+ grade · 11,017 residents

Top representative leader: Newcastle

A+ grade · 12,238 residents

Top representative leader: Corvallis

B- grade · 60,424 residents

Directional only: this state still lacks a strong representative leader, so use the card as a browse layer and verify cities individually.

Top representative leader: Levittown

B- grade · 50,930 residents

Directional only: this state still lacks a strong representative leader, so use the card as a browse layer and verify cities individually.

Top representative leader: Warwick

B+ grade · 82,871 residents

Directional only: this state still lacks a strong representative leader, so use the card as a browse layer and verify cities individually.

Top representative leader: North Charleston

B+ grade · 117,460 residents

Directional only: this state still lacks a strong representative leader, so use the card as a browse layer and verify cities individually.

Top representative leader: Aberdeen

A grade · 28,297 residents

Top representative leader: Tullahoma

A+ grade · 20,672 residents

Top representative leader: Stephenville

A+ grade · 21,345 residents

Top representative leader: Brigham City

C- grade · 19,796 residents

Directional only: this state’s representative city pool is still weak, so treat the card as a risk map and compare tradeoffs city by city.

Top representative leader: Burlington

A+ grade · 44,649 residents

Top representative leader: Colonial Heights

A+ grade · 18,210 residents

Top representative leader: Yelm

A+ grade · 10,618 residents

Top representative leader: Wheeling

A- grade · 26,670 residents

Top representative leader: Portage

A grade · 10,374 residents

Top representative leader: Evanston

B+ grade · 11,803 residents

Directional only: this state still lacks a strong representative leader, so use the card as a browse layer and verify cities individually.